Fatal Ego
Equilibrium Territory of Human Rationality Conceit
Thinkers in the West who try to discuss rational conceit.
The process of human thoughts and behavior from rationalism principles to human empiricism.
Exaggerated the ability of human experience and ignored the primacy. People are increasingly overestimating the rational ability of human beings.
Description of the history of thought allows us to truly penetrate the human situation. After more than 100 years of first-principles tradition began to flourish from Descartes, it was challenged by empiricism starting from Hume and Locke, which lasted for about 100 years.
The result of the debate between the two schools of thought is a comprehensive judgment obtained by Kant. rationalism based on first principles and empiricism based on human experience has become two methods of human science at the same time, and they have been standardized and synthesized by Kant.
In the emergence of the history of thought, there is no concept phenomenon in which rationalism negates empiricism or empiricism negates rationalism.
The diverse ideological contention of intellectuals has broadened the horizons of the human mind and found more specific methods.
Many liberal scholars start thinking from Hayek’s critics, that is, what Hayek opposes is also what they oppose.
For example, grand governmentism, Collectivism, Deprivation of individual rights, Artificial calculation of market economy, Keynesianism.
In these cases, people start with result-oriented and criticized targets based on their established methodology, rather than starting with conceptual order.
Hayek’s analytical framework, all the targets of these criticisms
The dilemma of the original concept
It was the past, It is now time, It will be the future.
In terms of the criticism, the rational conceit of Keynesianism or totalitarianism.
The fatal conceit of reason is the real reason why this world has been in a state of corruption for a long time.
