Nowadays Anti-Social Tendency
Concept of Animal Reason
I believe that history will remember the Covid-19 virus for a long time, not only to record the evil of China, but also to comprehensively record the shamelessness of human science, and record that people in this era have collectively turned into laboratory mice. The vaccines that are clearly marked as experimental products have not undergone thorough scientific experiments and demonstrations. Politicians in this era have begun to forcibly inject this experimental vaccine into people’s bodies.
There is some absurdity and some collective stupidity. Darwin’s theory of evolution has brought huge damage to the human value lineage. The reality of this thought is more and more understood by people. The thought that is more destructive than Darwin’s thought is David Hume’s animal rationality, which is about animal rationality. Construction, through the systematization and application of economics by economist Keynes, has almost brought human society into the darkest age in history.
Human rational conceit runs wildly along the path of animal rationality so that animal rationality has become the greatest political correctness of our time. Therefore, we can definitely believe that the so-called animal rational thought trend, which is very popular in the modern sense, is a hidden evil against humanity.
We think that a tree has a nervous system, but this belongs to the realm of physics, not thought and intelligence, and it has no soul. Science is possible because there is always an equilibrium and equilibrium of knowledge, such as the speed of light, the speed on Earth, and the speed in outer space, which is stable. This constitutes an equilibrium condition for scientific research.
We cannot use this scientific equilibrium thinking to deal with human nature, because human nature is the carrier of a soul, and human nature has been in a state of uncertainty and non-equilibrium for a long time. As the Bible reveals, the human heart is deceitful above all things, and human beings can never fully understand human nature except God. Therefore, human beings cannot use the scientific general equilibrium thinking to study human beings themselves.
This is most importantly common sense. Science is the study of physical objects, biblical discourse is the laying out of the human soul landscape, and the theory of human nature is the study of human thought and wisdom. People often conflate these important principles. If we assume that animals have a capacity for thinking similar to human nature, a capacity for human language intelligence, or even a capacity for the grief of the soul, then we must agree that the animal world can too. Develop a system of civilization that is homogenous to our own. Conversely, that is to say, when we find that it is impossible for animals to develop a human civilization system, it means that human intelligence and animal intelligence are not in a balanced condition, so the scientific ability of animals cannot be possible.
Although science claims to be prosperous and developed, so far it has not found the slightest existence similar to human civilization in the depths of the universe. Human civilization on earth hangs lonely like a lonely seed in the vast universe. Some people once thought that the shape of the earth’s civilization is unique, and there must be civilizations on other planets, but the shape is completely different. When people on earth try to find civilizations on other planets, the civilization concepts they use are only those of the earth. Human scientists are not smart, they always compress deeper and greater things into the narrow human brain.
The funny thing is that human’s understanding of animals is also forced to interpret animals as human beings. When philosophers invented the concept of rationality, they were finally anxious to understand animals as rational beings. This is the ideological predicament of the current society. When people want to expand their authority, they often understand living people with souls as animals; when they want to expand their knowledge, they often understand animals as living beings with souls. people. The shamelessness and corruption of human beings have finally developed to the extent of committing evil without a bottom line in the name of science.
The research approach of neurons in modern brain science is actually scientific research that first defines human beings as animal rationality. At first, they used animals as experimental objects to forcibly search for rationality in the animal world; The argument of beauty pulls people down to the dimension of the existence of animals, and thus conducts scientific research with human beings as experimental objects. Man is no longer a noble being specially created by God, but a guinea pig in a laboratory. As a result, scientists no longer take the human soul as a fact for granted and no longer believe in the breath of life breathed by God from the nose of human beings. They found a new scientific term, “neurons” that exist in animals and people.
It is precisely in the concept of “neuron” that a living person with a soul has a huge ideological divergence from modern brain science. Modern scientists are such a group of people that they lack the inheritance of beliefs, the profound understanding of the soul, and the cognition of the complexity of human life. They only understand human beings as scientific objects. In fact, neurons happen to be rational judgments of animals, while humans are living beings with souls, which constitutes a huge ambiguity in contemporary brain research.
The existence of ambiguity prevents us from discussing. A neuron is just a physical phenomenon and can be studied and subdivided. Brain science is thus possible. But once brain science becomes a fact, its research object will not be animal rationality, but the human brain and the human brain must be the research object. That is to say, the concept of animal rationality stated by the philosopher Hume has lost its basic meaning here. The reason why scientists continue to use the concept of animal rationality is just to find a plausible reason for them to use humans as a laboratory test.
Modern scholars have secretly carried out a shameless conceptual replacement here and invented a set of theories that are close to evil: animal rationality is equal to human rationality, and human brains are equal to animal brains.
The danger of human rational conceit is that when we interpret human brains as animal brains, we reduce the meaning of human beings and enter into the great evil against humanity in the name of science.
